-
SingleWingHokie
- 2 stars Rating: 38
141 votes total - (328)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
Tyrod4Heisman
- 5 stars Rating: 90
752 votes total - (914)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SingleWingHokie said...
The reason this is happening if this tidbit is true is because Texas is pissed at ACC for getting PITT. TIFWIW. IF so this means again the Eers were not really wanted but had to be. Also it makes you wonder about connection Pitt may have with Notre Dame. Guru's? This sound credible?
ScottsdaleHokie
- 4 stars Rating: 77
207 votes total - (205)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SingleWingHokie
- 2 stars Rating: 38
141 votes total - (328)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
- This post is for members of VTScoop or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
CZYHOKIE ●
- 5 stars Rating: 94
10993 votes total - (9017)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of VTScoop or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
-
ScottsdaleHokie said...
Not to me. None of this stuff is based on emotion; it is based on money. That said, it makes no sense at all (at least to me) for Clemson, FSU, WVU or anyone else based in the East to think even for a moment about the Big 12. Events eventually might prove me wrong, but I just will not believe any of this FSU or Clemson to the Big 12 unless I actually see it.
Now any of them to the SEC -- that would be a different story.
This post was edited by Oakie on 6/12/2012 at 10:30 AM
-
Enter Night ●
- 5 stars Rating: 83
1381 votes total - (1285)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SingleWingHokie said...
The reason this is happening if this tidbit is true is because Texas is pissed at ACC for getting PITT. TIFWIW. IF so this means again the Eers were not really wanted but had to be. Also it makes you wonder about connection Pitt may have with Notre Dame. Guru's? This sound credible?
-
SingleWingHokie
- 2 stars Rating: 38
141 votes total - (328)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
Jamerson Center
- 4 stars Rating: 72
11 votes total - (23)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Jamerson Center said...
That's not accurate from my desk. The most recent round of expansion was (television) market driven, not driven by natural rivalries or by seeking to entice ND. ND's sole influencing factor will continue to be 1) NBC contract and 2) pathway to BCS level/playoff games. Until one of those factors necessitates a change, or until a comparable revenue package is presented, ND will remain independant in football.
Loudoun Hokie ●
- 4 stars Rating: 80
1949 votes total - (1584)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Jamerson Center said...
That's not accurate from my desk. The most recent round of expansion was (television) market driven, not driven by natural rivalries or by seeking to entice ND. ND's sole influencing factor will continue to be 1) NBC contract and 2) pathway to BCS level/playoff games. Until one of those factors necessitates a change, or until a comparable revenue package is presented, ND will remain independant in football.
-
Oakie said...
But isn't it just as difficult to understand why T A&M and Missouri would move to the SEC were it not for the money. As several have posted, this is about money and being at the "head table" more than it is geography. Realignment simply can not be based on or justified by geography. It's about being in a stable conference and financial viability...
ScottsdaleHokie
- 4 stars Rating: 77
207 votes total - (205)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
SingleWingHokie
- 2 stars Rating: 38
141 votes total - (328)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
SingleWingHokie said...
Agree they will have to if it is 4 conference champ model. I think the question is which league they pick and how powerful that league becomes. IMHO Big 12 still not stable. That is why flirtation with the two acc schools. Now Texas and OU are stable. They know there is a home out there somewhere. Do not be surprised if Big 10 is looking at both. Pac 12 we know wants both.
- This post is for members of VTScoop or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
- This post is for members of VTScoop or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
-
TheClubhouseKB said...
The only reason that the B12 might become unstable, obviously, is if Texas or Oklahoma would decide to leave. Last year when we were having conversations about the B12 crumbling and Texas/ OU possibly leaving (and taking OK St. and TT along), many of us (myself included) didn't fully realize how little interest there was in most of the other B12 schools in terms of their value to other conferences. So long as Texas and OU stay put, the B12 is stable. No disrespect to Iowa State, Baylor, K-State and the like, but they're just not that attractive as primary targets when it comes to expansion. Despite decidedly mediocre football, there's a reason that ACC schools have been primary targets. Schools in bigger markets, more attractive localities, better recruiting bases, etc.
And if there's one conference that doesn't NEED to expand, it's the Big 10. Not saying they wouldn't be open to it, but with a $2.8 billion deal with the Big 10 Network, a nice ESPN/ABC deal, huge academic money, monster enrollments/alumni networks, etc. that conference is fine and will continue to be.
Tyrod4Heisman
- 5 stars Rating: 90
752 votes total - (914)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of VTScoop or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
-
ct_wallace ●
- 5 stars Rating: 99
166 votes total - (1160)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SingleWingHokie
- 2 stars Rating: 38
141 votes total - (328)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
SingleWingHokie said...
Yea but has it slowed down? Some peeps say without ND Big 12 do not want either ACC team? Nothing against you guys but which info being read is total truth. The one thing the Big 12 has working for it is tie in with SEC. But that was because SEC wants ACC to die. Meaning SEC power did it. Grant of Rights? Sure it says they have them. I would imagine Texas and OU has some clauses built in. JMHO. I mean basically a few bloggers from Big 12 teams have controlled the panic. It may be true. May be more about both acc teams fighting Tobacco Road and posturing. Or using Big 12. We shall see. Hopefully VT peeps know what is happening.






Just heard interesting Expansion tidbit...