The Tunnel

damn Kyle, fantastic list of guests!

This is really one huge question, but it could go in a lot of directions. You're the pro, so you'll see where I'm going with this.

Question: We often hear you say you want your offense to be "multiple," and by all accounts it is.... And we also often hear the staff after games saying it was "one block here, a missed assignment there," that prevented the offense from getting traction. Do you think at some point the multiplicity of the offense has contributed to the seemingly high number of blown assignments, missed communications, and overall offensive inefficiency over the last decade?

And before he answers, you might add on a classifier like: We (fans) see Clemson and Auburn, and West Virgina and teams like that go up and down the field with relative ease even in the first year their offenses were implemented, and theircoordinators (Malzahn, Holgerson, and Morris) often say their concepts are simple. What make your offense so difficult to master? Is it the multiplicity? Has the staff ever considered adopting a wholesale philosophical change on the offense; one that focuses on a singular concept?

What's his VTScoop screen name. tia

Good interview Kyle, I have to agree with Stiney on the idea of keeping the 1st team o-line together to build the chemistry throughout the Spring.

Did he say Leal was playing tomorrow?

That's weird because they have him listed on the roster instead of shutting him down, and there was no mention made. I'd go with TCB's scoop on this one. I figured they would leave him off the roster altogether if they were shutting him down, but he's listed on the roster so we assumed that meant he'd take some snaps. Especially since there was no mention of how banged up Trey Gresh is.

Kyle, can you post that ink? Would love to hear the Mike London interview as well.

Thanks.